Browse by Aston Author

Article

Bali, Agnes S., Basu, Nabanita, Weber, Philip, Rosas-Aguilar, Claudia, Edmond, Gary, Martire, Kristy A. and Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart (2024). Speaker identification in courtroom contexts – Part III: Groups of collaborating listeners compared to forensic voice comparison based on automatic-speaker-recognition technology. Forensic Science International, 360 ,

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart (2024). Bi-Gaussianized calibration of likelihood ratios. Law, Probability and Risk, 23 (1),

Basu, Nabanita, Weber, Philip, Bali, Agnes S, Rosas-Aguilar, Claudia, Edmond, Gary, Martire, Kristy A and Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart (2023). Speaker identification in courtroom contexts – Part II: Investigation of bias in individual listeners’ responses. Forensic Science International, 349 ,

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart (2023). A response to Busey & Klutzke (2022): Regarding subjective assignment of likelihood ratios. Science and Justice, 63 (1), pp. 61-62.

Basu, Nabanita, Bali, Agnes S, Weber, Philip, Rosas-Aguilar, Claudia, Edmond, Gary, Martire, Kristy A and Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart (2022). Speaker identification in courtroom contexts - Part I: Individual listeners compared to forensic voice comparison based on automatic-speaker-recognition technology. Forensic science international, 341 ,

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart (2022). A plague on both your houses: The debate about how to deal with “inconclusive” conclusions when calculating error rates. Law, Probability and Risk, 21 (2), 127–129.

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart, Basu, Nabanita, Enzinger, Ewald and Weber, Philip (2022). The opacity myth: A response to Swofford & Champod (2022). Forensic Science International: Synergy, 5 ,

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart, Ramos, Daniel, Ypma, Rolf JF, Basu, Nabanita, Bie, Kim de, Enzinger, Ewald, Geradts, Zeno, Meuwly, Didier, Vloed, David van der, Vergeer, Peter and Weber, Philip (2022). A strawman with machine learning for a brain: A response to Biedermann (2022) the strange persistence of (source) “identification” claims in forensic literature. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 4 ,

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart (2022). Advancing a paradigm shift in evaluation of forensic evidence: The rise of forensic data science. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 5 ,

Basu, Nabanita, Bolton-King, Rachel S. and Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart (2022). Forensic comparison of fired cartridge cases: Feature-extraction methods for feature-based calculation of likelihood ratios. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 5 ,

Weber, Philip, Enzinger, Ewald, Labrador, Beltrán, Lozano-díez, Alicia, Ramos, Daniel, González-rodríguez, Joaquín and Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart (2022). Validations of an alpha version of the E3 Forensic Speech Science System (E3FS3) core software tools. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 4 ,

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart, Weber, Philip, Basu, Nabanita, Puch-Solis, Roberto and Randolph-Quinney, Patrick S. (2021). Calculation of likelihood ratios for inference of biological sex from human skeletal remains. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 3 ,

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart (2021). In the context of forensic casework, are there meaningful metrics of the degree of calibration? Forensic Science International: Synergy, 3 ,

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart, Enzinger, Ewald, Hughes, Vincent, Jessen, Michael, Meuwly, Didier, Neumann, Cedric, Planting, S., Thompson, William C., van der Vloed, David, Ypma, Rolf J.F., Zhang, Cuiling, Anonymous, A. and Anonymous, B. (2021). Consensus on validation of forensic voice comparison. Science and Justice, 61 (3), pp. 299-309.

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart, Neumann, Cedric, Geoghegan, Patrick Henry, Edmond, Gary, Grant, Tim, Ostrum, R. Brent, Roberts, Paul, Saks, Michael, Syndercombe Court, Denise, Thompson, William C. and Zabell, Sandy (2021). Reply to Response to Vacuous standards – subversion of the OSAC standards-development process. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 3 ,

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart, Neumann, Cedric and Geoghegan, Patrick Henry (2020). Vacuous standards – Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 2 , pp. 206-209.

Rosas, Claudia, Sommerhoff, Jorge and Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart (2019). A method for calculating the strength of evidence associated with an earwitness’s claimed recognition of a familiar speaker. Science and Justice, 59 (6), pp. 585-596.

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart and Enzinger, Ewald (2019). Multi-laboratory evaluation of forensic voice comparison systems under conditions reflecting those of a real forensic case (forensic_eval_01) – Conclusion. Speech Communication, 112 , pp. 37-39.

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart and Kelly, F. (2019). A statistical procedure to adjust for time-interval mismatch in forensic voice comparison. Speech Communication, 112 , pp. 15-21.

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart, Zhang, Cuiling and Enzinger, Ewald (2018). 法庭说话人识别新范式实证研究. Journal of Chinese People's Public Security University(Science and Technology), 97 (3), pp. 30-37.

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart, Ballentyne, Kaye and Geoghegan, Patrick (2018). A response to Marquis et al (2017) What is the error margin of your signature analysis? Forensic Science International, 287 , e11-e12.

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart (2018). The impact in forensic voice comparison of lack of calibration and of mismatched conditions between the known-speaker recording and the relevant-population sample recordings. Forensic Science International, 283 , e1-e7.

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart (2018). Admissibility of forensic voice comparison testimony in England and Wales. Criminal Law Review, 2018 (1), pp. 20-33.

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart and Enzinger, Ewald (2018). Score based procedures for the calculation of forensic likelihood ratios - scores should take account of both similarity and typicality. Science and Justice, 58 (1), pp. 47-58.

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart and Poh, Norman (2017). Avoiding overstating the strength of forensic evidence: Shrunk likelihood ratios/Bayes factors. Science and Justice, 58 (3), pp. 200-218.

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart (2017). What should a forensic practitioner's likelihood ratio be? II. Science and Justice, 57 (6), pp. 472-476.

Enzinger, Ewald and Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart (2017). Empirical test of the performance of an acoustic-phonetic approach to forensic voice comparison under conditions similar to those of a real case. Forensic Science International, 277 , pp. 30-40.

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart and Thompson, William C. (2017). Assessing the admissibility of a new generation of forensic voice comparison testimony. Columbia Science and Technology Law Review, 18 , 326–434.

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart, Kaye, David H., Balding, David J., Taylor, Duncan, Dawid, Philip, Aitken, Colin G.G., Gittelson, Simone, Zadora, Grzegorz, Robertson, Bernard, Willis, Sheila, Pope, Susan, Neil, Martin, Martire, Kristy A., Hepler, Amanda, Gill, Richard D., Jamieson, Allan, de Zoete, Jacob, Ostrum, R. Brent and Caliebe, Amke (2017). A comment on the PCAST report:skip the “match”/“non-match” stage. Forensic Science International, 272 , e7-e9.

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart (2012). Perception of natural vowels by monolingual Canadian-English, Mexican-Spanish, and Peninsular-Spanish listeners. Canadian Acoustics - Acoustique Canadienne, 40 (4), pp. 29-39.

Book Section

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart, Enzinger, Ewald, Ramos, Daniel, González-Rodríguez, Joaquín and Lozano-Díez, Alicia (2020). Statistical models in forensic voice comparison. IN: Handbook of Forensic Statistics. Banks, D.L.; Kafadar, K.; Kaye, D.H. and Tackett, M. (eds) CRC Press.

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart, Zhang, Cuiling and Enzinger, Ewald (2019). Forensic speech science. IN: Expert Evidence. Freckelton, Ian and Selby, Hugh (eds) Sydney, Australia: Thomson Reuters.

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart and Enzinger, Ewald (2019). Introduction to forensic voice comparison. IN: The Routledge Handbook of Phonetics. Katz, William F and Assmann, Peter F (eds) Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart and Kinoshita, Yuko (2008). Automatic-type calibration of traditionally derived likelihood ratios:Forensic analysis of Australian English /o/ formant trajectories. IN: Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association. Proceedings of Interspeech . AUS: UNSPECIFIED.

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart (2006). An adaptive sampling procedure for speech perception experiments. IN: INTERSPEECH 2006 and 9th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, INTERSPEECH 2006 - ICSLP. USA: International Speech Communication Association.