Reply to Response to Vacuous standards – subversion of the OSAC standards-development process

Abstract

This Letter to the Editor is a reply to Mohammed et al. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100145, which in turn is a response to Morrison et al. (2020) “Vacuous standards – subversion of the OSAC standards-development process” https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.06.005.

Publication DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100149
Divisions: College of Engineering & Physical Sciences > School of Informatics and Digital Engineering > Computer Science
College of Engineering & Physical Sciences
College of Business and Social Sciences > Aston Institute for Forensic Linguistics
College of Engineering & Physical Sciences > School of Engineering and Technology > Mechanical, Biomedical & Design
College of Engineering & Physical Sciences > Aston Institute of Urban Technology and the Environment (ASTUTE)
?? 53981500Jl ??
College of Business and Social Sciences > School of Social Sciences & Humanities
Additional Information: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Uncontrolled Keywords: Forensic science,Method validation,Quality management,Standard,Validation,Pathology and Forensic Medicine,Law
Full Text Link:
Related URLs: https://www.sci ... 0176?via%3Dihub (Publisher URL)
http://www.scop ... tnerID=8YFLogxK (Scopus URL)
PURE Output Type: Letter
Published Date: 2021
Published Online Date: 2021-05-03
Accepted Date: 2021-04-26
Authors: Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart (ORCID Profile 0000-0001-8608-8207)
Neumann, Cedric
Geoghegan, Patrick Henry (ORCID Profile 0000-0003-1224-0477)
Edmond, Gary
Grant, Tim (ORCID Profile 0000-0002-5155-8413)
Ostrum, R. Brent
Roberts, Paul
Saks, Michael
Syndercombe Court, Denise
Thompson, William C.
Zabell, Sandy

Export / Share Citation


Statistics

Additional statistics for this record