A response to Busey & Klutzke (2022): Regarding subjective assignment of likelihood ratios


Busey & Klutzke (2022) states that “Morrison (2012) has argued that the likelihood ratio need not be quantitative but could be based on the expert's subjective evaluation.” The statement appears to suggest that Morrison (2012) argued in favour of subjective assignment of likelihood-ratio values. This interpretation of Morrison (2012) is incorrect.

Publication DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2022.11.003
Divisions: College of Business and Social Sciences > Aston Institute for Forensic Linguistics
Additional Information: Copyright © 2022 The Chartered Society of Forensic Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. This accepted manuscript version is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/]. Funding Information: The writing of this response was supported by Research England’s Expanding Excellence in England Fund as part of funding for the Aston Institute for Forensic Linguistics 2019–2024.
Uncontrolled Keywords: Forensic inference,Likelihood ratio,Subjective,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Publication ISSN: 1355-0306
Last Modified: 22 May 2024 17:06
Date Deposited: 07 Dec 2022 12:36
Full Text Link: http://A respon ... Busey & Klutzke
Related URLs: https://www.sci ... 355030622001514 (Publisher URL)
http://www.scop ... tnerID=8YFLogxK (Scopus URL)
PURE Output Type: Letter
Published Date: 2023-01
Published Online Date: 2022-11-25
Accepted Date: 2022-11-20
Authors: Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart (ORCID Profile 0000-0001-8608-8207)

Export / Share Citation


Additional statistics for this record