Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart (2023). A response to Busey & Klutzke (2022): Regarding subjective assignment of likelihood ratios. Science and Justice, 63 (1), pp. 61-62.
Abstract
Busey & Klutzke (2022) states that “Morrison (2012) has argued that the likelihood ratio need not be quantitative but could be based on the expert's subjective evaluation.” The statement appears to suggest that Morrison (2012) argued in favour of subjective assignment of likelihood-ratio values. This interpretation of Morrison (2012) is incorrect.
| Publication DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2022.11.003 |
|---|---|
| Divisions: | College of Business and Social Sciences > Aston Institute for Forensic Linguistics |
| Additional Information: | Copyright © 2022 The Chartered Society of Forensic Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. This accepted manuscript version is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/]. Funding Information: The writing of this response was supported by Research England’s Expanding Excellence in England Fund as part of funding for the Aston Institute for Forensic Linguistics 2019–2024. |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Forensic inference,Likelihood ratio,Subjective,Pathology and Forensic Medicine |
| Publication ISSN: | 1355-0306 |
| Last Modified: | 24 Apr 2024 16:45 |
| Date Deposited: | 07 Dec 2022 12:36 |
| Full Text Link: |
http://A respon ... Busey & Klutzke |
| Related URLs: |
https://www.sci ... 355030622001514
(Publisher URL) http://www.scop ... tnerID=8YFLogxK (Scopus URL) |
PURE Output Type: | Letter |
| Published Date: | 2023-01 |
| Published Online Date: | 2022-11-25 |
| Accepted Date: | 2022-11-20 |
| Authors: |
Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart
(
0000-0001-8608-8207)
|
Download
Version: Accepted Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives
| Preview
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)