Browse by Aston Author

Article

Basu, Nabanita, Bali, Agnes S, Weber, Philip, Rosas-Aguilar, Claudia, Edmond, Gary, Martire, Kristy A and Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart (2022). Speaker identification in courtroom contexts - Part I: Individual listeners compared to forensic voice comparison based on automatic-speaker-recognition technology. Forensic science international, 341 ,

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart, Basu, Nabanita, Enzinger, Ewald and Weber, Philip (2022). The opacity myth: A response to Swofford & Champod (2022). Forensic Science International: Synergy, 5 ,

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart, Ramos, Daniel, Ypma, Rolf JF, Basu, Nabanita, Bie, Kim de, Enzinger, Ewald, Geradts, Zeno, Meuwly, Didier, Vloed, David van der, Vergeer, Peter and Weber, Philip (2022). A strawman with machine learning for a brain: A response to Biedermann (2022) the strange persistence of (source) “identification” claims in forensic literature. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 4 ,

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart (2022). Advancing a paradigm shift in evaluation of forensic evidence: The rise of forensic data science. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 5 ,

Basu, Nabanita, Bolton-King, Rachel S. and Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart (2022). Forensic comparison of fired cartridge cases: Feature-extraction methods for feature-based calculation of likelihood ratios. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 5 ,

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart, Weber, Philip, Basu, Nabanita, Puch-Solis, Roberto and Randolph-Quinney, Patrick S. (2021). Calculation of likelihood ratios for inference of biological sex from human skeletal remains. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 3 ,

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart (2021). In the context of forensic casework, are there meaningful metrics of the degree of calibration? Forensic Science International: Synergy, 3 ,

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart, Enzinger, Ewald, Hughes, Vincent, Jessen, Michael, Meuwly, Didier, Neumann, Cedric, Planting, S., Thompson, William C., van der Vloed, David, Ypma, Rolf J.F., Zhang, Cuiling, Anonymous, A. and Anonymous, B. (2021). Consensus on validation of forensic voice comparison. Science and Justice, 61 (3), pp. 299-309.

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart, Neumann, Cedric, Geoghegan, Patrick Henry, Edmond, Gary, Grant, Tim, Ostrum, R. Brent, Roberts, Paul, Saks, Michael, Syndercombe Court, Denise, Thompson, William C. and Zabell, Sandy (2021). Reply to Response to Vacuous standards – subversion of the OSAC standards-development process. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 3 ,

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart, Neumann, Cedric and Geoghegan, Patrick Henry (2020). Vacuous standards – Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 2 , pp. 206-209.

Rosas, Claudia, Sommerhoff, Jorge and Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart (2019). A method for calculating the strength of evidence associated with an earwitness’s claimed recognition of a familiar speaker. Science and Justice, 59 (6), pp. 585-596.

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart and Kelly, F. (2019). A statistical procedure to adjust for time-interval mismatch in forensic voice comparison. Speech Communication, 112 , pp. 15-21.

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart (2018). Admissibility of forensic voice comparison testimony in England and Wales. Criminal Law Review, 2018 (1), pp. 20-33.

Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart and Poh, Norman (2017). Avoiding overstating the strength of forensic evidence: Shrunk likelihood ratios/Bayes factors. Science and Justice, 58 (3), pp. 200-218.