Incorrect formula for calculation of likelihood ratios used in forensic anthropology: Comments on Scott & Rogers (2026)

Abstract

Scott & Rogers (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112673 promotes the use of the likelihood-ratioframework in forensic anthropology. This is welcome. Unfortunately, Scott & Rogers (2026) uses an incorrectformula for the calculation of likelihood ratios. This incorrect formula did not originate in Scott & Rogers (2026).It has, for some time, been used in the forensic anthropology literature; an earlier occurrence appears inSteadman et al. (2006) https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20393. Scott & Rogers (2026) also uses confusing languageand mathematical notation that are non-standard compared to the norms of the forensic-inference-and-statisticsliterature. This letter to the editor is offered in the hope that it will help prevent repetition of these problems.

Publication DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2026.112859
Divisions: College of Business and Social Sciences > Aston Institute for Forensic Linguistics
Additional Information: Copyright © 2026, Elsevier B.V. This accepted manuscript version is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Publication ISSN: 0379-0738
Last Modified: 10 Feb 2026 08:06
Date Deposited: 09 Feb 2026 16:06
Full Text Link:
Related URLs: https://www.sci ... 0460?via%3Dihub (Publisher URL)
PURE Output Type: Article
Published Date: 2026-05-01
Published Online Date: 2026-02-03
Accepted Date: 2026-01-31
Authors: Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart (ORCID Profile 0000-0001-8608-8207)

Download

[img]

Version: Accepted Version

Access Restriction: Restricted to Repository staff only until 3 February 2027.

License: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives


Export / Share Citation


Statistics

Additional statistics for this record