Harper, Gavin D J, Kendrick, Emma, Anderson, Paul A, Mrozik, Wojciech, Christensen, Paul, Lambert, Simon, Greenwood, David, Das, Prodip K, Ahmeid, Mohamed, Milojevic, Zoran, Du, Wenjia, Brett, Dan J L, Shearing, Paul R, Rastegarpanah, Alireza, Stolkin, Rustam, Sommerville, Roberto, Zorin, Anton, Durham, Jessica L, Abbott, Andrew P, Thompson, Dana, Browning, Nigel D, Mehdi, B Layla, Bahri, Mounib, Schanider-Tontini, Felipe, Nicholls, D, Stallmeister, Christin, Friedrich, Bernd, Sommerfeld, Marcus, Driscoll, Laura L, Jarvis, Abbey, Giles, Emily C, Slater, Peter R, Echavarri-Bravo, Virginia, Maddalena, Giovanni, Horsfall, Louise E, Gaines, Linda, Dai, Qiang, Jethwa, Shiva J, Lipson, Albert L, Leeke, Gary A, Cowell, Thomas, Farthing, Joseph Gresle, Mariani, Greta, Smith, Amy, Iqbal, Zubera, Golmohammadzadeh, Rabeeh, Sweeney, Luke, Goodship, Vannessa, Li, Zheng, Edge, Jacqueline, Lander, Laura, Nguyen, Viet Tien, Elliot, Robert J R, Heidrich, Oliver, Slattery, Margaret, Reed, Daniel, Ahuja, Jyoti, Cavoski, Aleksandra, Lee, Robert, Driscoll, Elizabeth, Baker, Jen, Littlewood, Peter, Styles, Iain, Mahanty, Sampriti and Boons, Frank (2023). Roadmap for a sustainable circular economy in lithium-ion and future battery technologies. Journal of Physics: Energy, 5 ,
Abstract
The market dynamics, and their impact on a future circular economy for lithium-ion batteries (LIB), are presented in this roadmap, with safety as an integral consideration throughout the life cycle. At the point of end-of-life (EOL), there is a range of potential options—remanufacturing, reuse and recycling. Diagnostics play a significant role in evaluating the state-of-health and condition of batteries, and improvements to diagnostic techniques are evaluated. At present, manual disassembly dominates EOL disposal, however, given the volumes of future batteries that are to be anticipated, automated approaches to the dismantling of EOL battery packs will be key. The first stage in recycling after the removal of the cells is the initial cell-breaking or opening step. Approaches to this are reviewed, contrasting shredding and cell disassembly as two alternative approaches. Design for recycling is one approach that could assist in easier disassembly of cells, and new approaches to cell design that could enable the circular economy of LIBs are reviewed. After disassembly, subsequent separation of the black mass is performed before further concentration of components. There are a plethora of alternative approaches for recovering materials; this roadmap sets out the future directions for a range of approaches including pyrometallurgy, hydrometallurgy, short-loop, direct, and the biological recovery of LIB materials. Furthermore, anode, lithium, electrolyte, binder and plastics recovery are considered in order to maximise the proportion of materials recovered, minimise waste and point the way towards zero-waste recycling. The life-cycle implications of a circular economy are discussed considering the overall system of LIB recycling, and also directly investigating the different recycling methods. The legal and regulatory perspectives are also considered. Finally, with a view to the future, approaches for next-generation battery chemistries and recycling are evaluated, identifying gaps for research. This review takes the form of a series of short reviews, with each section written independently by a diverse international authorship of experts on the topic. Collectively, these reviews form a comprehensive picture of the current state of the art in LIB recycling, and how these technologies are expected to develop in the future.
Publication DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7655/acaa57 |
---|---|
Divisions: | College of Engineering & Physical Sciences > School of Computer Science and Digital Technologies College of Engineering & Physical Sciences > School of Computer Science and Digital Technologies > Applied AI & Robotics Aston University (General) |
Funding Information: | The authors are grateful to the following funders for support—the Faraday Institution’s ReLiB fast-start project (Grant Numbers FIRG005 and FIRG006) and the UKRI Interdisciplinary Circular Economy Centre for Technology Metals (TechMet) EP/V011855/1 |
Additional Information: | Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI. |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Roadmap,batteries,circular economy,legislation,lithium-ion,recycling,sustainability |
Publication ISSN: | 2515-7655 |
Last Modified: | 01 Sep 2025 07:39 |
Date Deposited: | 29 Aug 2025 14:25 |
Full Text Link: | |
Related URLs: |
https://iopscie ... 515-7655/acaa57
(Publisher URL) |
PURE Output Type: | Article |
Published Date: | 2023-02-20 |
Accepted Date: | 2022-12-09 |
Authors: |
Harper, Gavin D J
Kendrick, Emma Anderson, Paul A Mrozik, Wojciech Christensen, Paul Lambert, Simon Greenwood, David Das, Prodip K Ahmeid, Mohamed Milojevic, Zoran Du, Wenjia Brett, Dan J L Shearing, Paul R Rastegarpanah, Alireza ( ![]() Stolkin, Rustam Sommerville, Roberto Zorin, Anton Durham, Jessica L Abbott, Andrew P Thompson, Dana Browning, Nigel D Mehdi, B Layla Bahri, Mounib Schanider-Tontini, Felipe Nicholls, D Stallmeister, Christin Friedrich, Bernd Sommerfeld, Marcus Driscoll, Laura L Jarvis, Abbey Giles, Emily C Slater, Peter R Echavarri-Bravo, Virginia Maddalena, Giovanni Horsfall, Louise E Gaines, Linda Dai, Qiang Jethwa, Shiva J Lipson, Albert L Leeke, Gary A Cowell, Thomas Farthing, Joseph Gresle Mariani, Greta Smith, Amy Iqbal, Zubera Golmohammadzadeh, Rabeeh Sweeney, Luke Goodship, Vannessa Li, Zheng Edge, Jacqueline Lander, Laura Nguyen, Viet Tien Elliot, Robert J R Heidrich, Oliver Slattery, Margaret Reed, Daniel Ahuja, Jyoti Cavoski, Aleksandra Lee, Robert Driscoll, Elizabeth Baker, Jen Littlewood, Peter Styles, Iain Mahanty, Sampriti Boons, Frank |