Social competencies mediate relationships between styles of social media usage and psychosocial wellbeing.

Abstract

Background & Aim Studies have produced inconsistent findings when exploring relationships between social media usage (SMU) and wellbeing. This likely reflects the vast heterogeneity in subjective measures of SMU, coupled with a lack of consideration for the factors that influence different styles of SMU and drive individual differences in susceptibility to their effects. To advance our understanding of social media effects, the present study used a novel objective measure of individuals’ behaviour on social networking sites to examine whether distinct SMU styles are related differentially to social competencies that support real-world social interaction, and if these user characteristics mediate relationships between SMU styles and indices of psychosocial wellbeing. Methods A total of 509 participants (261 females; Mage = 31.00, 18-71 years) completed the Social Networking Site Behaviour Task that measured styles of SMU objectively, the Multidimensional Social Competency Scale that captured self-reported competencies in seven domains of interpersonal behaviour, and four subjective measures of psychosocial wellbeing. Structural Equation Modelling was used to determine if social competencies differed among distinct SMU styles and mediated relationships with psychosocial variables. Findings: We identify interactive, reactive and passive SMU styles, reveal that users expressing these distinct styles differ on several social competencies, and discover that these competencies mediate differential relationships between SMU styles and indices of psychosocial wellbeing. Discussion: Just as individual differences in social competencies manifest in face-to-face interactions, we suggest that they also underpin SMU styles and shape individual differences in susceptibility to their effects on wellbeing.

Publication DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100753
Divisions: College of Health & Life Sciences
College of Health & Life Sciences > School of Psychology
Aston University (General)
Funding Information: This study was supported by internal funds from the College of Health & Life Sciences, Aston University. It received no external financial support.
Additional Information: Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).
Publication ISSN: 2451-9588
Data Access Statement: All study materials, code, data, and supplementary material for this study are publicly available on the Open Science Framework (OSF): htt ps://osf.io/hn83w/
Last Modified: 22 Jul 2025 07:15
Date Deposited: 21 Jul 2025 14:26
Full Text Link:
Related URLs: https://www.sci ... 168X?via%3Dihub (Publisher URL)
PURE Output Type: Article
Published Date: 2025-08
Published Online Date: 2025-07-15
Accepted Date: 2025-07-14
Authors: Pennington, Charlotte Rebecca (ORCID Profile 0000-0002-5259-642X)
Murray, Evelyn A.H.
Kaye, Linda K.
Burgess, Adrian P.
Kessler, Klaus
Shaw, Daniel Joel (ORCID Profile 0000-0003-1139-8301)

Download

[img]

Version: Published Version

License: Creative Commons Attribution


Export / Share Citation


Statistics

Additional statistics for this record