Lu, Rebecca Tianning (2024). Strategising Organisational Challenges With Sensible Foolishness and Procedural Rationality. PHD thesis, Aston University.
Abstract
For March (2006), prevailing modes of intelligence, supported by technologies of rationality, are often inadequate, misguided and even disastrous when deployed by managers facing complex organisational challenges. March’s (1971) concept of sensible foolishness is presented as an approach to combat the dominance of procedural rationality and a means to realise sensible foolishness is through play. Despite this proposition, managers continue to draw upon rational technologies and seek to use these tools in rational and objective ways to yield desired ends. Some research streams (e.g. the tools-in-use paradigm) have begun to challenge the dominant view within materiality studies, which tends to focus on the dichotomy between the correct and incorrect way to use tools. However, we still have a limited understanding of the process surrounding the interplay between sensible foolishness (i.e. play) and procedural rationality (i.e. reason) and how this unfolds in practice. This thesis therefore employs a sociomaterial lens to explore how serious organisational challenges can be navigated through playful means. I conducted this research within the context of three SMEs using a multiple data set comprising interviews, observations and video and audio-recorded episodes of strategy workshops. Three key findings emerged from the data. First, I show how play and reason undergo an evolving fluidity during strategy making sessions, where managers realise unintended process affordances that manifest from this interplay. Second, I show how existing hierarchical structures can be temporarily suspended through playful interaction. Third, I show how physical visuals stemming from play can support the sharing of tacitness during strategy making. Altogether, this thesis unpacks how organisational actors escape their logic of reason and temporarily suspend rational imperatives (March, 1971), offering contributions and insights into how sensible foolishness is actually performed in-practice during strategy making.
Publication DOI: | https://doi.org/10.48780/publications.aston.ac.uk.00047759 |
---|---|
Divisions: | College of Business and Social Sciences > Aston Business School |
Additional Information: | Copyright © Rebecca Tianning Lu, 2024. Rebecca Tianning Lu asserts their moral right to be identified as the author of this thesis. This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without appropriate permission or acknowledgement. If you have discovered material in Aston Publications Explorer which is unlawful e.g. breaches copyright, (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please read our Takedown Policy and contact the service immediately. |
Institution: | Aston University |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Strategy-as-practice,play,sensible foolishness,procedural rationality,sociomateriality,process affordances |
Last Modified: | 02 Jul 2025 15:49 |
Date Deposited: | 02 Jul 2025 15:45 |
Completed Date: | 2024-09 |
Authors: |
Lu, Rebecca Tianning
|