Shared decision-making interventions in the choice of antipsychotic prescription in people living with psychosis (SHAPE):Protocol for a realist review

Abstract

Background: Shared decision-making (SDM) has yet to be successfully adopted into routine use in psychiatric settings amongst people living with severe mental illnesses. Suboptimal rates of SDM are particularly prominent amongst patients with psychotic illnesses during antipsychotic treatment choices. Many interventions have been assessed for their efficacy in improving SDM within this context, although results have been variable and inconsistent. Aims: To generate an in-depth understanding of how, why, for whom, and to what extent interventions facilitating the application of SDM during antipsychotic treatment choices work and the impact of contextual factors on intervention effectiveness. Methods: This review will use realist review methodology to provide a causal understanding of how and why interventions work when implementing SDM during antipsychotic treatment choices. The cohort of interest will be those experiencing psychosis where ongoing treatment with an antipsychotic is clinically indicated. The review will take place over five stages; (1) Locating existing theories, (2) Searching for evidence, (3) Selecting articles, (4) Extracting and organising data and (5) Synthesizing evidence and drawing conclusions. An understanding of how and why interventions work will be achieved by developing realist programme theories on intervention effectiveness through iterative literature reviews and engaging with various stakeholder groups, including patient, clinician and carer representatives. Discussion: This is the first realist review aiming to identify generative mechanisms explaining how and why successful interventions aimed at improving SDM within the parameters outlined work and in which contexts desired outcomes are most likely to be achieved. Review findings will include suggestions for clinicians, policy and decision-makers about the most promising interventions to pursue and their ideal attributes.

Publication DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304626
Divisions: College of Health & Life Sciences > Aston Pharmacy School
College of Health & Life Sciences
College of Health & Life Sciences > Chronic and Communicable Conditions
Aston University (General)
Funding Information: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Additional Information: Copyright: © 2024 Fitzgerald et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Uncontrolled Keywords: Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use,Choice Behavior,Decision Making, Shared,Humans,Patient Participation,Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy
Publication ISSN: 1932-6203
Data Access Statement: No results are reported - this is a protocol paper. Data availability statement not required.
Last Modified: 18 Oct 2024 02:45
Date Deposited: 26 Jul 2024 13:59
Full Text Link:
Related URLs: https://journal ... al.pone.0304626 (Publisher URL)
http://www.scop ... tnerID=8YFLogxK (Scopus URL)
PURE Output Type: Article
Published Date: 2024-07
Published Online Date: 2024-07-25
Accepted Date: 2024-05-14
Submitted Date: 2023-11-01
Authors: Fitzgerald, Ita
Sahm, Laura J.
Howe, Jo (ORCID Profile 0000-0002-7567-075X)
Maidment, Ian (ORCID Profile 0000-0003-4152-9704)
Wallace, Emma
Crowley, Erin K.

Download

[img]

Version: Published Version

License: Creative Commons Attribution

| Preview

Export / Share Citation


Statistics

Additional statistics for this record