Chobanov, Jan D., Wang, Zixuan, Man, Kenneth K.C., Dayib, Edil, Lip, Gregory Y.H., Hingorani, Aroon D., Leung, Wai K., Wong, Ian C.K., Mongkhon, Pajaree and Lau, Wallis C.Y. (2024). Sex-specific comparative outcomes between oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Heart, 11 (2),
Abstract
AIMS: Women with atrial fibrillation (AF) are under-represented in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). This systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs and observational studies examined sex-specific outcomes of DOACs in AF. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched from January 2008 to November 2022. Sex-specific comparative outcomes of stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding, intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) and gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) between oral anticoagulants were pooled using random effects models. P values for interaction were calculated to examine differences in results between sexes. RCTs and observational studies were meta-analysed separately. RESULTS: 5 RCTs and 33 observational studies were included, totalling 1 085 931 women and 1 387 123 men. Meta-analyses showed that for both sexes, DOAC versus warfarin was generally associated with lower risk of stroke/SE, major bleeding and ICH; in DOAC-DOAC comparisons, rivaroxaban versus dabigatran had higher GIB risk. The only sex-specific difference observed was that when compared with warfarin, women had higher GIB risk with rivaroxaban (women: pooled risk ratio (pRR)=1.34, 95% CI=1.18 to 1.51; men: pRR=0.97, 95% CI=0.85 to 1.10; p value for interaction (p for interaction)<0.001) and possibly dabigatran (women: pRR=1.25, 95% CI=0.92 to 1.70; men: pRR=0.83, 95% CI=0.72 to 0.97; p-for-interaction=0.02). The sex difference in GIB remained for rivaroxaban when a Bonferroni-corrected significance level was used (α=0.003). No sex-specific GIB data for apixaban and edoxaban was available for the meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: For both sexes, DOACs generally demonstrated favourable effectiveness and safety over warfarin. However, observational data suggested that women may have higher GIB risk with rivaroxaban and possibly dabigatran than warfarin. Further studies are warranted to verify our findings and elucidate sex-specific GIB risk with apixaban and edoxaban, of which the data is currently lacking. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022325027.
Publication DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-002792 |
---|---|
Divisions: | College of Health & Life Sciences > Aston Pharmacy School |
Additional Information: | Copyright © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Meta-Analysis,Stroke,Atrial Fibrillation,Systematic Reviews as Topic |
Publication ISSN: | 2053-3624 |
Data Access Statement: | All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information. |
Last Modified: | 13 Aug 2024 16:01 |
Date Deposited: | 22 Jul 2024 15:52 |
Full Text Link: | |
Related URLs: |
https://openhea ... nt/11/2/e002792
(Publisher URL) http://www.scop ... tnerID=8YFLogxK (Scopus URL) |
PURE Output Type: | Article |
Published Date: | 2024-07-16 |
Published Online Date: | 2024-07-16 |
Accepted Date: | 2024-07-02 |
Authors: |
Chobanov, Jan D.
Wang, Zixuan Man, Kenneth K.C. Dayib, Edil Lip, Gregory Y.H. Hingorani, Aroon D. Leung, Wai K. Wong, Ian C.K. ( ![]() Mongkhon, Pajaree Lau, Wallis C.Y. |