“Good Care Is Slow Enough to Be Able to Pay Attention”: Primary Care Time Scarcity and Patient Safety

Abstract

Background: There is growing, widespread recognition that expectations of US primary care vastly exceed the time and resources allocated to it. Little research has directly examined how time scarcity contributes to harm or patient safety incidents not readily capturable by population-based quality metrics. Objective: To examine near-miss events identified by primary care physicians in which taking additional time improved patient care or prevented harm. Design: Qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews. Participants: Twenty-five primary care physicians practicing in the USA. Approach: Participants completed a survey that included demographic questions, the Ballard Organizational Temporality Scale and the Mini-Z scale, followed by a one hour qualitative interview over video-conference (Zoom). Iterative thematic qualitative data analysis was conducted. Key Results: Primary care physicians identified several types of near-miss events in which taking extra time during visits changed their clinical management. These were evident in five types of patient care episodes: high-risk social situations, high-risk medication regimens requiring patient education, high acuity conditions requiring immediate workup or treatment, interactions of physical and mental health, and investigating more subtle clinical suspicions. These near-miss events highlight the ways in which unreasonably large patient panels and packed schedules impede adequate responses to patient care episodes that are time sensitive and intensive or require flexibility. Conclusions: Primary care physicians identify and address patient safety issues and high-risk situations by spending more time than allotted for a given patient encounter. Current quality metrics do not account for this critical aspect of primary care work. Current healthcare policy and organization create time scarcity. Interventions to address time scarcity and to measure its prevalence and implications for care quality and safety are urgently needed.

Publication DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-08658-1
Divisions: College of Business and Social Sciences > Aston Business School > Work & Organisational Psychology
College of Business and Social Sciences
Funding Information: Dr. Sarkar holds current research funding from the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health, California Healthcare Foundation, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. She has received prior grant funding from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, the Blue Shield of California Foundation, HopeLab, the US Food and Drug Administration, and the Commonwealth Fund. She received gift funding from The Doctors Company Foundation. She holds contract funding from InquisitHealth and RecoverX. Dr. Sarkar serves as a scientific/expert advisor for nonprofit organizations HealthTech 4 Medicaid (volunteer) and for HopeLab (volunteer). She is a member of the American Medical Association’s Equity and Innovation Advisory Group (honoraria) and is on the Board of Directors of the Collaborative for Accountability and Improvement (volunteer). She is an advisor for Waymark (shares) and for Ceteri Capital I GP, LLC (shares). She has been a clinical advisor for Omada Health (honoraria), and an advisory board member for Doximity (honoraria, stock). Salary support for Dr. Michelle-Linh Nguyen was provided by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Dr. Aoife McDermott was a 2022–23 Commonwealth Fund Harkness Fellow in Health Care Policy and Practice. The views presented here are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Commonwealth Fund or its directors, officers, or staff.
Additional Information: Copyright © Springer Nature B.V. 2024. This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use [https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/policies/accepted-manuscript-terms], but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-08658-1
Uncontrolled Keywords: primary care, safety, quality, near-miss, time scarcity, work design
Publication ISSN: 1525-1497
Last Modified: 02 Feb 2026 08:12
Date Deposited: 22 Feb 2024 14:17
Full Text Link:
Related URLs: https://link.sp ... able%20to%20pay (Publisher URL)
http://www.scop ... tnerID=8YFLogxK (Scopus URL)
PURE Output Type: Article
Published Date: 2024-07
Published Online Date: 2024-02-15
Accepted Date: 2024-01-24
Authors: Shatterwhite, Shannon
Nguyen, Michelle-Linh T.
Honcharov, Vlad
McDermott, Aoife M. (ORCID Profile 0000-0002-9195-7435)
Sarkar, Urmimala

Download

[img]

Version: Accepted Version

License: ["licenses_description_other" not defined]

| Preview

Export / Share Citation


Statistics

Additional statistics for this record