Komaris, Sokratis, Govind, Cheral, Murphy, Andrew James, Clarke, Jon, Ewen, Alistair, Leonard, Hollie and Riches, Philip (2021). Implant design affects walking and stair navigation after total knee arthroplasty:a double-blinded randomised controlled trial. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 16 (1),
Abstract
Background: Dissimilar total knee arthroplasty implant designs offer different functional characteristics. This is the first work in the literature to fully assess the Columbus ultra-congruent mobile (UCR) system with a rotating platform. Methods: This is a double-blinded randomised controlled trial, comparing the functional performance of the low congruent fixed (CR DD), ultra-congruent fixed (UC) and UCR Columbus Total Knee Systems. The pre-operative and post-operative functional performance of twenty-four osteoarthritic patients was evaluated against nine control participants when carrying out everyday tasks. Spatiotemporal, kinematic and kinetic gait parameters in walking and stair navigation were extracted by means of motion capture. Results: The UC implant provided better post-operative function, closely followed by the UCR design. However, both the UC and UCR groups exhibited restricted post-operative sagittal RoM (walking, 52.1 ± 4.4° and 53.2 ± 6.6°, respectively), whilst patients receiving a UCR implant did not show an improvement in their tibiofemoral axial rotation despite the bearing’s mobile design (walking, CR DD 13.2 ± 4.6°, UC 15.3 ± 6.7°, UCR 13.5 ± 5.4°). Patients with a CR DD fixed bearing showed a statistically significant post-operative improvement in their sagittal RoM when walking (56.8 ± 4.6°). Conclusion: It was concluded that both ultra-congruent designs in this study, the UC and UCR bearings, showed comparable functional performance and improvement after TKA surgery. The CR DD group showed the most prominent improvement in the sagittal RoM during walking. Trial registration: The study is registered under the clinical trial registration number: NCT02422251. Registered on April 21, 2015.
Publication DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02311-x |
---|---|
Divisions: | College of Engineering & Physical Sciences > School of Engineering and Technology > Mechanical, Biomedical & Design College of Engineering & Physical Sciences > School of Engineering and Technology |
Additional Information: | © 2021, The Author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Fixed bearing,Implant congruency,Knee prosthesis,Mobile bearing,Motion analysis,Range of motion,Surgery,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine |
Publication ISSN: | 1749-799X |
Last Modified: | 06 Aug 2024 09:41 |
Date Deposited: | 08 Feb 2023 14:35 |
Full Text Link: | |
Related URLs: |
https://josr-on ... 018-021-02311-x
(Publisher URL) |
PURE Output Type: | Article |
Published Date: | 2021-03-06 |
Accepted Date: | 2021-02-17 |
Authors: |
Komaris, Sokratis
(![]() Govind, Cheral Murphy, Andrew James Clarke, Jon Ewen, Alistair Leonard, Hollie Riches, Philip |