Reduced Audit Quality Behaviour in Government Audit

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine reduced audit quality behaviour (RAQB) in the context of government audit practice that may remain unobservable. It is intended to explore how RAQB occurs behind the audit fieldwork curtain. This research seeks to construct a comprehensive understanding of the types of specific RAQBs that could be prevalent among government auditors, the probable reasons for these behaviours and also the audit organisation's responses to tackling such behaviour. This research discusses RAQB that may be viewed through the theoretical lens of paradox perspective. This study applies a qualitative research methodology using observation, interviews and review of documents. Observation was conducted in five audit teams performing financial audit engagements in one Indonesian government audit organisation for a total of 26 days or 189 hours (an average of 7.3 hours per day). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 50 respondents consisting of 31 auditors and 19 non-auditors. The empirical data show that the auditors engaged in three types of RAQBs: (1) premature or false sign-off or a failure to fully complete all or some steps in an audit procedure, yet reporting the outcome as satisfactory, {2} superficial audit supervision and (3) sample reduction (performing a reduction of tested items in a predetermined sample). Using paradox theory as the theoretical lens, this study reveals that RAQB may be associated with three paradoxical conditions: the paradox of audit control, paradox of dynamic audit knowledge and paradox of audit team. By adapting the dynamic equilibrium model of Smith and Lewis (2011), the findings have provided the empirical evidence explaining that RAQB could be caused by paradoxical tensions within the organisation. Based on the overall findings, this study contributes to three areas of understanding: research in RAQB, auditing research more generally and also an extension of the discussion of paradox theory.

Divisions: College of Business and Social Sciences > Aston Business School > Accounting
Additional Information: Copyright © Firdaus Amyar, 2016. Firdaus Amyar asserts his moral right to be identified as the author of this thesis. This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without appropriate permission or acknowledgement. If you have discovered material in Aston Publications Explorer which is unlawful e.g. breaches copyright, (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please read our Takedown Policy and contact the service immediately.
Institution: Aston University
Uncontrolled Keywords: Paradox,Audit Control,Dynamic Audit Knowledge,Audit Team Dynamic
Last Modified: 30 Sep 2024 08:35
Date Deposited: 10 May 2022 09:55
Completed Date: 2016-05
Authors: Amyar, Firdaus

Export / Share Citation


Statistics

Additional statistics for this record