Exploring the design risk factors for modular integrated construction projects

Abstract

Purpose: Modular integrated construction (MiC) is considered as a process innovation to improve the performance of construction projects. However, effective delivery of MiC projects requires management of risks and uncertainties throughout its delivery chain. Although the design stage of MiC projects is usually managed with limited knowledge based on highly uncertain data and associated with epistemic uncertainties, MiC design risks have not received adequate research attention relative to other stages. The purpose of this paper is to conduct a knowledge-based evaluation and ranking of the design risk factors (DRFs) for MiC projects. Design/methodology/approach: The paper reviewed the relevant literature to identify potential DRFs and validated their relevance through pilot expert review. The paper then used questionnaires to gather data from international MiC experts from 18 countries and statistically analyzed the data set. Findings: Analysis results showed that the five most significant DRFs for MiC projects include unsuitability of design for the MiC method; late involvement of suppliers, fabricators and contractors; inaccurate information, defective design and change order; design information gap between the designer and fabricator; and lack of bespoke MiC design codes and guidelines. A correlation analysis showed that majority of the DRFs have statistically significant positive relationships and could inform practitioners on the dynamic links between the DRFs. Practical implications: The paper provides useful insight and knowledge to MiC practitioners and researchers on the risk factors that could compromise the success of MiC project designs and may inform design risk management. The dynamic linkages among the DRFs instruct the need to adopt a system-thinking philosophy in MiC project design. Originality/value: This paper presents the first study that specifically evaluates and prioritizes the risk events at the design stage of MiC projects. It sets forth recommendations for addressing the identified DRFs for MiC projects.

Publication DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-02-2021-0025
Divisions: College of Engineering & Physical Sciences > School of Infrastructure and Sustainable Engineering > Engineering Systems and Supply Chain Management
Funding Information: This research received full funding from the Hong Kong Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (RGC, UGC) and the Hong Kong Polytechnic University under the Hong Kong PhD Fellowship Scheme (PF17 ‐ 00649). However, the conclusions do not repre
Additional Information: © 2021 Emerald Publishing. This AAM is deposited under the CC BY-NC 4.0 licence. Any reuse is allowed in accordance with the terms outlined by the licence. To reuse the AAM for commercial purposes, permission should be sought by contacting permissions@emeraldinsight.com. Funding Information: This research received full funding from the Hong Kong Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (RGC, UGC) and the Hong Kong Polytechnic University under the Hong Kong PhD Fellowship Scheme (PF17 ‐ 00649).
Uncontrolled Keywords: Critical risk factors,Delivery chain,Design risks,Modular integrated construction,Project delivery,Risk management,Control and Systems Engineering,General Computer Science,Civil and Structural Engineering,Architecture ,Building and Construction
Publication ISSN: 1477-0857
Last Modified: 18 Nov 2024 08:26
Date Deposited: 06 Jan 2022 09:35
Full Text Link:
Related URLs: http://www.scop ... tnerID=8YFLogxK (Scopus URL)
https://www.eme ... -0025/full/html (Publisher URL)
PURE Output Type: Article
Published Date: 2021-12-21
Published Online Date: 2021-12-21
Accepted Date: 2021-12-01
Authors: Wuni, Ibrahim Yahaya
Shen, Geoffrey Qiping
Antwi-Afari, Maxwell Fordjour (ORCID Profile 0000-0002-6812-7839)

Download

Export / Share Citation


Statistics

Additional statistics for this record