Differences in presentation, severity and management of DKA in type 1 and type 2 diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract

Introduction: COVID-19 infection in people with diabetes is associated with a disproportionately increased risk of complications and mortality.1 Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is an acute complication of diabetes.2,3 Little is known about DKA in the presence of COVID-19 infection. This study aimed to explore the effects of COVID-19 infection on presentation, clinical course and outcome in patients presenting with DKA. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all patients treated for DKA between 1 March and 30 May 2020 at University Hospitals Birmingham. Patients were categorised as COVID-positive or negative based on PCR swab test. A pre-COVID group was established as external control. Data regarding demographics, diabetes type, admission pH, bicarbonate, lactate, glucose, serum electrolytes, urea, creatinine, time to resolution of acidosis and ketosis, complications and outcome were collected. DKA onset was defined as the presence of hyperglycaemia (serum glucose >11 mmol/L), ketosis (serum ketones >3 mmol/L or urine ketone >+++) and metabolic acidosis (pH <7.3 or bicarbonate <15 mmol/L) and DKA resolution as (ketone <0.6 mmol/L or urinary ketones ≤++ and pH >7.3 or bicarbonate >15 mmol/L) as per national guidelines in the UK.4 Results: A total of 88 episodes were included in the final analysis (20 COVID-positive, 31 COVID-negative, 37 pre-COVID). These were further sub-classified into type 1 (five COVID-positive, two COVID-negative, 29 pre-COVID) and type 2 diabetes (15 COVID-positive, two COVID-negative, eight pre-COVID). There was no significant difference in the severity of DKA at presentation (median for COVID positive, COVID negative and pre-COVID groups): pH (7.15 vs 7.2 vs 7.2), bicarbonate (11.4 mmol/L vs 11 mmol/L vs 13.3 mmol/L), glucose (25.85 mmol/L vs 30.9 mmol/L vs 29.1 mmol/L), lactate (2.7 mmol/L vs 3.2 mmol/L vs 2.8 mmol/L), serum osmolality (314.6 mmol/L vs 323.1 mmol/L vs 316.2 mmol/L). There was also no significant difference between the groups for the duration of DKA (from the time of admission to resolution of DKA: 12.5 hours vs 14.9 hours vs 17.9 hours for COVID-positive, COVID-negative and pre-COVID groups, respectively; Fig 1). COVID-positive patients with type 1 diabetes were more hyperglycaemic on admission compared to COVID-negative and pre-COVID patients. There was a significantly higher incidence of type 2 diabetes in COVID-positive patients than in pre-COVID or COVID-negative groups. COVID-negative patients had more episodes of hypokalaemia and hyperkalaemia during DKA compared to other two groups. There was no significant difference between the number of episodes of hypokalaemia in the COVID-positive compared to the pre-COVID group. In patients with type 2 diabetes, hypokalaemia was more common in COVID-negative patients. Conclusion: COVID infection appears to influence the natural history of DKA differently in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Infection was associated with increased hyperglycaemia in type I diabetes and greater acidosis on presentation with DKA. People with type 2 diabetes were presenting unusually in DKA when infected with COVID. These patients also had higher mortality rates. There is need for a multi-centre approach to conduct larger cohort studies in this area.

Publication DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.21-2-s1
Divisions: College of Health & Life Sciences > School of Biosciences
College of Health & Life Sciences
College of Health & Life Sciences > Chronic and Communicable Conditions
Additional Information: © Royal College of Physicians 2021. All rights reserved.
Uncontrolled Keywords: COVID-19,Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications,Diabetic Ketoacidosis/epidemiology,Humans,Pandemics,SARS-CoV-2
Publication ISSN: 1473-4893
Last Modified: 23 Apr 2024 07:20
Date Deposited: 21 Jun 2021 10:03
Full Text Link:
Related URLs: https://www.rcp ... ne/21/Suppl_2/1 (Publisher URL)
http://www.scop ... tnerID=8YFLogxK (Scopus URL)
PURE Output Type: Review article
Published Date: 2021-03-31
Accepted Date: 2021-03-01
Authors: Wallett, Lucy
Kempegowda, Punith
Melson, Eka
Juszczak, Agata
Thomas, Lucretia
Zhou, Dengyi
Holmes, Catherine
Karamat, Muhammad Ali
Ghosh, Sandip
Hanif, Wasim
Johnson, Agnes
Narendran, Parth
Bellary, Srikanth (ORCID Profile 0000-0002-5924-5278)

Download

[img]

Version: Published Version

| Preview

Export / Share Citation


Statistics

Additional statistics for this record