Wolffsohn, James S, Calossi, Antonio, Cho, Pauline, Gifford, Kate, Jones, Lyndon, Jones, Deborah, Guthrie, Sarah, Li, Ming, Lipener, Cesar, Logan, Nicola S, Malet, Florence, Peixoto-de-matos, Sofia C., González-méijome, José M., Nichols, Jason J, Orr, Janis B, Santodomingo-rubido, Jacinto, Schaefer, Tania, Thite, Nilesh, Van Der Worp, Eef, Tarutta, Elena, Iomdina, Elena, Ali, Bariah Mohd, Villa-collar, César, Abesamis-dichoso, Carmen, Chen, Connie, Pult, Heiko, Blaser, Pascal, Parra Sandra Johanna, Garzon, Iqbal, Fatima, Ramos, Raul, Carrillo Orihuela, Guillermo and Boychev, Nikolay (2020). Global trends in myopia management attitudes and strategies in clinical practice – 2019 Update. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, 43 (1), pp. 9-17.
Abstract
Purpose: A survey in 2015 identified a high level of eye care practitioner concern about myopia with a reported moderately high level of activity, but the vast majority still prescribed single vision interventions to young myopes. This research aimed to update these findings 4 years later. Methods: A self-administrated, internet-based questionnaire was distributed in eight languages, through professional bodies to eye care practitioners globally. The questions examined: awareness of increasing myopia prevalence, perceived efficacy of available strategies and adoption levels of such strategies, and reasons for not adopting specific strategies. Results: Of the 1336 respondents, concern was highest (9.0 ± 1.6; p < 0.001) in Asia and lowest (7.6 ± 2.2; p < 0.001) in Australasia. Practitioners from Asia also considered their clinical practice of myopia control to be the most active (7.7 ± 2.3; p < 0.001), the North American practitioners being the least active (6.3 ± 2.9; p < 0.001). Orthokeratology was perceived to be the most effective method of myopia control, followed by pharmaceutical approaches and approved myopia control soft contact lenses (p < 0.001). Although significant intra-regional differences existed, overall, most practitioners did not consider single-vision distance under-correction to be an effective strategy for attenuating myopia progression (79.6 %), but prescribed single vision spectacles or contact lenses as the primary mode of correction for myopic patients (63.6 ± 21.8 %). The main justifications for their reluctance to prescribe alternatives to single vision refractive corrections were increased cost (20.6 %) and inadequate information (17.6 %). Conclusions: While practitioner concern about myopia and the reported level of activity have increased over the last 4 years, the vast majority of eye care clinicians still prescribe single vision interventions to young myopes. With recent global consensus evidence-based guidelines having been published, it is hoped that this will inform the practice of myopia management in future.
Publication DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2019.11.002 |
---|---|
Divisions: | College of Health & Life Sciences > School of Optometry > Optometry College of Health & Life Sciences > School of Optometry > Optometry & Vision Science Research Group (OVSRG) College of Health & Life Sciences College of Health & Life Sciences > School of Optometry > Vision, Hearing and Language Aston University (General) |
Additional Information: | © 2019, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Attitudes,Global,Myopia control,Myopia management,Myopia progression,Orthokeratology,Ophthalmology,Optometry |
Publication ISSN: | 1476-5411 |
Last Modified: | 31 Oct 2024 17:42 |
Date Deposited: | 06 Dec 2019 14:37 |
Full Text Link: | |
Related URLs: |
https://linking ... 367048419302589
(Publisher URL) http://www.scop ... tnerID=8YFLogxK (Scopus URL) |
PURE Output Type: | Article |
Published Date: | 2020-02 |
Published Online Date: | 2019-11-21 |
Accepted Date: | 2019-11-01 |
Authors: |
Wolffsohn, James S
(
0000-0003-4673-8927)
Calossi, Antonio Cho, Pauline Gifford, Kate Jones, Lyndon Jones, Deborah Guthrie, Sarah Li, Ming Lipener, Cesar Logan, Nicola S ( 0000-0002-0538-9516) Malet, Florence Peixoto-de-matos, Sofia C. González-méijome, José M. Nichols, Jason J Orr, Janis B Santodomingo-rubido, Jacinto Schaefer, Tania Thite, Nilesh Van Der Worp, Eef Tarutta, Elena Iomdina, Elena Ali, Bariah Mohd Villa-collar, César Abesamis-dichoso, Carmen Chen, Connie Pult, Heiko Blaser, Pascal Parra Sandra Johanna, Garzon Iqbal, Fatima Ramos, Raul Carrillo Orihuela, Guillermo Boychev, Nikolay |
Download
Version: Accepted Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives
| Preview