On the likelihood of surrogates conforming to the substituted judgment standard when making end-of-life decisions for their partner


A considerable proportion of end-of-life decisions are made by the patient’s next-of-kin, who can be asked to follow the substituted judgment standard and decide based on the patient’s wishes. The question of whether these surrogate decision makers are actually able to do so has become an important issue. In this study, we examined how the likelihood of surrogates conforming to the substituted judgment standard varies with individual differences in mortality acceptance and confidence in their decision making. We recruited 153 participants in romantic relationships between 18 and 80 years old from the general population. We asked them to make hypothetical end-of-life decisions for themselves and on behalf of their partner, as well as predict what their partner would do, and complete a series of questionnaires. Participants predicted that their partner would make similar decisions to their own but were more likely to accept a life-saving treatment that could result in reduced quality of life on their partner’s behalf than for themselves. Decisions made by older adults were more likely to conform to the substituted judgment standard, which is encouraging given that they are more likely to be confronted with these decisions in real life, although this was not due to differences in mortality acceptance. Older adults were also more likely to have had previous discussions with their partner and thereby know that person’s wishes and feel confident that they made the right decision, but these factors did not affect their likelihood of conforming to the substituted judgment standard. This shows that encouraging discussions about end of life among families would ease the decision process, but more work is needed to ensure that surrogates can adhere to the substituted judgment standard.

Publication DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X19862800
Divisions: College of Health & Life Sciences > School of Psychology
College of Health & Life Sciences
Additional Information: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
Uncontrolled Keywords: aging,end of life,substituted judgment standard,surrogate decision making,Health Policy
Publication ISSN: 0272-989X
Last Modified: 10 Jun 2024 07:34
Date Deposited: 20 Jun 2019 09:25
Full Text Link:
Related URLs: https://journal ... 272989X19862800 (Publisher URL)
http://www.scop ... tnerID=8YFLogxK (Scopus URL)
PURE Output Type: Article
Published Date: 2019-08-01
Published Online Date: 2019-07-29
Accepted Date: 2019-06-03
Authors: Tunney, Richard (ORCID Profile 0000-0003-4673-757X)
Batteux, Eleonore
Ferguson, Eamonn



Version: Accepted Version

Access Restriction: Restricted to Repository staff only


Version: Published Version

License: Creative Commons Attribution

| Preview

Export / Share Citation


Additional statistics for this record