Humanism and Instrumentalism in Management Ethics Across Seven Countries

Abstract

The current research project set out to identify similarities and differences in values held by managers in the U.S., Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Poland, Russia, and Australia. Specifically, this was done using the humanism and instrumentalism construct where the former indicates that people in organisations have an end value in themselves and the latter indicates that people are seen primarily as a means to an end. The humanism scale indicated cultural differences as predicted by ‘Western’ and ‘non-Western’ cultures. The instrumental scale proved more problematic to interpret, providing only confirmation of the classic Japanese profile which features in the management literature.

Publication DOI: https://doi.org/10.48780/publications.aston.ac.uk.00021449
Divisions: College of Business and Social Sciences > Aston Business School
Additional Information: Copyright © C.A. David, 1999. C.A. David asserts their moral right to be identified as the author of this thesis. This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without appropriate permission or acknowledgement. If you have discovered material in Aston Publications Explorer which is unlawful e.g. breaches copyright, (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please read our Takedown Policy and contact the service immediately.
Institution: Aston University
Uncontrolled Keywords: humanism,instrumentalism,management ethics,cross-cultural management
Last Modified: 24 Apr 2025 10:49
Date Deposited: 19 Mar 2014 11:30
Completed Date: 1999-10
Authors: David, C.A.

Export / Share Citation


Statistics

Additional statistics for this record