Misrepresentations and flawed logic about the prevalence of false memories

Nash, Robert A., Wade, Kimberley A., Garry, Maryanne, Loftus, Elizabeth F. and Ost, James (2017). Misrepresentations and flawed logic about the prevalence of false memories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31 (1), 31–33.

Abstract

Brewin and Andrews (2016) propose that just 15% of people, or even fewer, are susceptible to false childhood memories. If this figure were true, then false memories would still be a serious problem. But the figure is higher than 15%. False memories occur even after a few short and low-pressure interviews, and with each successive interview they become richer, more compelling, and more likely to occur. It is therefore dangerously misleading to claim that the scientific data provide an “upper bound” on susceptibility to memory errors. We also raise concerns about the peer review process.

Publication DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3265
Divisions: Life & Health Sciences
Life & Health Sciences > Applied Health Research Group
Additional Information: © 2016 The Authors Applied Cognitive Psychology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Uncontrolled Keywords: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Full Text Link:
Related URLs: http://www.scop ... tnerID=8YFLogxK (Scopus URL)
Published Date: 2017-01
Authors: Nash, Robert A. ( 0000-0002-2284-2001)
Wade, Kimberley A.
Garry, Maryanne
Loftus, Elizabeth F.
Ost, James

Download

[img]

Version: Published Version

License: Creative Commons Attribution

| Preview

Export / Share Citation


Statistics

Additional statistics for this record