Identifying reliable, valid markers of authorship: a response to Chaski

Grant, Tim D. and Baker, Kevin L. (2001). Identifying reliable, valid markers of authorship: a response to Chaski. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 8 (1), pp. 66-79.


In response to Chaski’s article (published in this volume) an examination is made of the methodological understanding necessary to identify dependable markers for forensic (and general) authorship attribution work. This examination concentrates on three methodological areas of concern which researchers intending to identify markers of authorship must address. These areas are sampling linguistic data, establishing the reliability of authorship markers and establishing the validity of authorship markers. It is suggested that the complexity of sampling problems in linguistic data is often underestimated and that theoretical issues in this area are both difficult and unresolved. It is further argued that the concepts of reliability and validity must be well understood and accounted for in any attempts to identify authorship markers and that largely this is not done. Finally, Principal Component Analysis is identified as an alternative approach which avoids some of the methodological problems inherent in identifying reliable, valid markers of authorship.

Divisions: Languages & Social Sciences > English Language
Additional Information: First publication by 'International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law' and Equinox
Uncontrolled Keywords: authorship attribution,markers of authorship,reliability,validity,sampling,stylometrics
Published Date: 2001


Full text not available from this repository.

Export / Share Citation


Additional statistics for this record