Baker, Daniel H. and Meese, Tim S.
(2013).
Regarding the benefit of zero-dimensional noise.
Journal of Vision, 13
(10),
Abstract
Baker and Meese (2012) (B&M) provided an empirically driven criticism of the use of two-dimensional (2D) pixel noise in equivalent noise (EN) experiments. Their main objection was that in addition to injecting variability into the contrast detecting mechanisms, 2D noise also invokes gain control processes from a widely tuned contrast gain pool (e.g., Foley, 1994). B&M also developed a zero-dimensional (0D) noise paradigm in which all of the variance is concentrated in the mechanisms involved in the detection process. They showed that this form of noise conformed much more closely to expectations than did a 2D variant.
Publication DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1167/13.10.26 |
---|---|
Divisions: | Life & Health Sciences > Optometry Life & Health Sciences |
Additional Information: | © 2013 ARVO. Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | psychophysics,noise masking,contrast jitter,contrast detection,suppression,Sensory Systems,Ophthalmology |
Full Text Link: | |
Related URLs: |
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886236737&partnerID=8YFLogxK
(Scopus URL) http://jov.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2121381 (Publisher URL) |
Published Date: | 2013-10-29 |
Authors: |
Baker, Daniel H.
Meese, Tim S. ( ![]() |
Download
Version: Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives
| Preview