Good and bad institutions:is the debate over? Cross-country firm-level evidence from the textile industry

Bhaumik, Sumon Kumar and Dimova, Ralitza (2014). Good and bad institutions:is the debate over? Cross-country firm-level evidence from the textile industry. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38 (1), pp. 109-126.

Abstract

Using firm-level data from nine developing countries, we demonstrate that certain institutions, like restrictive labour market regulations, that are considered bad for economic growth might be beneficial for production efficiency, whereas good business environment, which is considered beneficial for economic growth, might have an adverse impact on production efficiency. We argue that our results suggest that there might be significant difference in the macro- and micro-impacts of institutional quality, such that the classification of institutions into 'good' and 'bad might be premature.

Publication DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bes089
Divisions: Aston Business School > Economics finance & entrepreneurship research group
Related URLs:
Additional Information: This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Cambridge journal of economics] following peer review. The version of record Bhaumik, S. K., & Dimova, R. (2014). Good and bad institutions – is the debate over? Cross-country firm-level evidence from the textile industry. Cambridge journal of economics, 38(1), 109-126 is available online at: http://cje.oxfordjournals.org/content/38/1/109
Uncontrolled Keywords: institutional quality,production efficiency,stochastic frontier model,Economics and Econometrics
Published Date: 2014

Download

[img]

Version: Submitted Version

Export / Share Citation


Statistics

Additional statistics for this record