Semantic annotation support in the absence of consensus

Sereno, Bertrand, Uren, Victoria, Buckingham Shum, Simon and Motta, Enrico (2004). Semantic annotation support in the absence of consensus. IN: UNSPECIFIED Berlin (DE): Springer.

Abstract

We are interested in the annotation of knowledge which does not necessarily require a consensus. Scholarly debate is an example of such a category of knowledge where disagreement and contest are widespread and desirable, and unlike many Semantic Web approaches, we are interested in the capture and the compilation of these conflicting viewpoints and perspectives. The Scholarly Ontologies project provides the underlying formalism to represent this meta-knowledge, and we will look at ways to lighten the burden of its creation. After having described some particularities of this kind of knowledge, we introduce ClaimSpotter, our approach to support its ‘capture’, based on the elicitation of a number of recommendations which are presented for consideration to our annotators (or analysts), and give some elements of evaluation.

Publication DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25956-5_25
Divisions: Aston Business School > Operations & information management
Event Title: 1st European Semantic Web Symposium
Event Type: Other
Event Dates: 2004-05-10 - 2004-05-12
Full Text Link: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-540-25956-5_25
Related URLs:
Published Date: 2004
Authors: Sereno, Bertrand
Uren, Victoria
Buckingham Shum, Simon
Motta, Enrico

Export / Share Citation


Statistics

Additional statistics for this record